/blog/racism-in-recruitment-remove-bias-in-the-recruiting-process/-29-06-2020
Racism is always a sensitive problem, and today, it has become a delicate topic more than ever in recruitment.
As the human rights activist Archbishop Desmond Tutu once said:
“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”
Therefore, taking action toward removing unconscious bias on race to embrace diversity in recruitment is regarded as the upward trend of all businesses in the world.
But what are unconscious biases on race, why it is important to remove them in your hiring process, and how to achieve that ideal process? Check out all these best practices to review your current recruiting process and make it better!
Unconscious bias is also known as implicit bias. Unconscious bias refers to a bias that is unaware of and triggered by our brain making quick judgments and assessments of people and situations depending on their race, and it strongly influences our decision in hiring a candidate or not.
Read more: Eye-opening Best Practice Strategies for Diversity Recruiting
It is proved that removing racial unconscious bias in the campus recruitment process can help the business reach out to the best talents, improve the employees’ performance, and increase business profits.
According to a McKinsey report
Companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians”.
Moreover, many studies have indicated that teams consisting of both white and black members often focus more on facts, carefully analyze information, and come up with great innovations when the organizational culture and leadership support learning across differences.
In terms of legal aspects, there are many countries that enact laws to stop the discrimination in workplace.
Despite all the benefits of a diverse workplace, minorities still struggle to find good positions in a wide range of industries and sectors. positions in a wide range of industries and sectors.
For example, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, at U.S. finance companies in 2019, only 2.4% of members of the executive committee, 1.4% of managers and directors, and 1.4% of senior portfolio managers are black. Similarly, in a 2020 report by University College London, 46% of all schools in the UK do not have Black, Asian, and minority ethnic.
So how can unconscious bias occur throughout your campus recruitment process?
Many candidate resumes are put in the trash bin just because they have ethnic names or come from black universities or African countries.
In a recent Bloomberg article, it was discovered that names with distinctive minority traits are still 2.1% less likely to be contacted by employers relative to “White-sounding” names. It may result from the unconscious or, in some cases, a conscious bias of recruiters/screeners themselves that makes it hard for them to stop.
According to new research by Havard and other institutes, there are groups of candidates, who share similar qualifications who come to interview for the jobs, they all share similar qualifications, and the only difference is the color of their skin. It comes to the conclusion that white candidates gain 36% more callback than black ones. Therefore, it is essential for employers to remove the unconscious bias to employ candidates based on their potential, knowledge, and skills, not their skin, nationalities, or ethnicity.
While gender-bias is the most common bias that happens with job descriptions, there are some racial bias words that you should look out for in your job descriptions. For instance, the phrase “Master/Slave”, indicating software architecture, is used in many database-related job ads. In 2004, it was ranked by Global Language Monitor as “the most politically incorrect term”. As a result, giant tech companies such as IBM, Microsoft, and Amazon Web Services have changed the words “master/slave” into “primary/replica”
Unconscious biases often lurk subtly within our workplaces, manifesting in various forms. Let's delve into the most common types that may impact our recruiting processes:
This happens when we're naturally drawn to people who are like us in some way. It could be because of similar backgrounds, experiences, or interests.
For example, if a hiring manager prefers candidates who went to the same school they did, they might unintentionally ignore other qualified candidates who bring different perspectives.
This is when we look for information that agrees with what we already believe and ignore anything that doesn't. In recruiting, this can make it hard to see past our initial opinions and make fair decisions.
For instance, if a hiring team already has an idea of what they want in a candidate, they might only focus on things that fit that idea and ignore anything else that could be important.
This is when we judge ourselves more positively than we judge others.
To illustrate, if we succeed at something, we might think it's because we're smart or talented. But if someone else succeeds, we might say it's just luck or because of something else. This can lead to unfair judgments in hiring, where one candidate might be praised for their achievements while others aren't given the same credit.
This happens when we let our overall impression of someone influence how we see everything else about them.
For example, if a candidate impresses us with their confidence or looks, we might overlook any weaknesses they have. This can lead to biased decisions where candidates are chosen based on things that aren't really relevant to the job.
This is when we make assumptions about people based on stereotypes or what we think we know about them.
For instance, if we have certain ideas about what kind of person is best suited for a job, we might overlook candidates who don't fit those ideas, even if they're actually qualified.
Start by helping recruiters and hiring managers understand that they may unknowingly hold biases. Offer internal training sessions that explain what unconscious bias is and provide strategies for recognizing and minimizing its impact on the hiring process.
Example:
Starbucks took proactive steps in 2018 by closing all its stores across the U.S. and Canada for sessions focused on racial bias training. These sessions, conducted by implicit bias experts and civil rights activists, aimed to educate employees on recognizing and addressing unconscious biases. This proactive approach demonstrated Starbucks' commitment to fostering inclusivity and diversity within its workforce.
Actionable Tips:
Studies show that bias can emerge right from the moment a potential candidate reads a job description. Certain words and phrases may unintentionally discourage certain groups from applying. For instance, terms like “strong English skills” might deter non-native English speakers. It's crucial to use neutral language in job descriptions to attract a more diverse pool of candidates. Explore these effective tech tools to help review your job descriptions:
Textio - This augmented writing platform evaluates your existing job descriptions, assigns a score, and provides suggestions to enhance it. A higher score increases the likelihood of attracting a diverse range of applicants.
Gender Decoder - A free tool that helps companies analyze their job descriptions for gender-coded language. For example, words like ‘driven’ may be perceived as masculine, while ‘dependable’ as feminine. This tool assists in reducing or eliminating gender bias from job descriptions.
Actionable Tips:
The best way to attract more potential candidates and increase your team diversity is to diversify your JD advertisement channels. Besides common job posting sites such as Indeed, and Career Builder, social channels such as Linkedin, etc. are also a great source of advertising to valuable candidates regardless of race, education, and background. Below are a few examples of diversity-specialized websites for job hunting that you can try out:
Actionable Tips:
\ Read more: Increase the Diversity in Your Campus Recruiting Program
Employing structured evaluation forms is vital for reducing unconscious bias in hiring. This means following set procedures that focus on a candidate's skills and job-related qualities rather than personal traits. Here's how it helps:
Using tools like Rakuna makes it easy to use standardized evaluation forms in interviews. They help recruiters and hiring managers assess candidates fairly and follow the law and company policies.
Blind hiring involves removing or anonymizing personal information to prevent unconscious bias during the candidate evaluation process. This approach encourages a more open-minded assessment of a candidate's skills, knowledge, and potential for success. The key components of blind hiring include:
For instance, during the initial screening phase, recruiters could review resumes without information revealing the candidate's name, preventing biases based on gender, ethnicity, or location.
An example is utilizing online assessments to evaluate a candidate's coding skills without knowing details like their educational background, ensuring a fair evaluation based solely on merit.
For instance, conducting initial interview rounds via chat where the focus is solely on responses to job-related questions without the interviewer knowing the candidate's identity
For many U.S. companies, having an applicant tracking system (ATS) as a record-keeping system for the entire application process is almost mandatory to ensure compliance with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) rules which require companies to demonstrate non-discriminatory practices. The ATS can track all your job requisitions, job descriptions, advertisement channels, search results from the ATS database, notes, and decisions all along the way from the moment a candidate applies to your company until the final decision is made. It is not only a helpful tool for compliance, but also helpful for your team to review your process, and results, and make adjustments if needed.
Beyond ATS, there are candidate relationship management (CRM) tools, that track prospective candidates before they become your applicants, They are also useful for recording your treatment of all prospective candidates to ensure your company is not violating any discrimination rules. Here are selected CRM and ATS tools for your consideration:
Employing data-driven decision-making involves regularly analyzing hiring data to uncover patterns of bias in the campus recruitment process. By leveraging this information, organizations can refine their hiring strategies and track progress toward diversity and inclusion objectives. Here's how to implement this approach effectively:
For example, monitoring data may reveal disparities in the selection rates of candidates from different demographic groups, highlighting potential areas of bias.
For instance, if data analysis indicates that candidates from underrepresented groups are less likely to advance beyond the initial screening stage, strategies such as blind resume screening may be implemented to mitigate bias.
For example, set specific targets for increasing the representation of marginalized groups within the workforce and use hiring data to monitor progress toward these goals.
Establishing mentorship and sponsorship programs is a proactive step toward supporting underrepresented employees in their career growth and development. These programs not only benefit individual employees but also contribute to creating a pipeline of diverse talent for future hiring needs. Here's how to effectively implement mentorship and sponsorship initiatives:
For example, a senior female executive may mentor a junior female employee, offering insights into career advancement opportunities and strategies for overcoming barriers.
For instance, a senior leader may sponsor a talented employee from an underrepresented group by publicly endorsing their work and advocating for their inclusion in leadership development programs.
For example, a mentorship program that supports women in technology may help cultivate a pipeline of female talent for technical roles within the organization.
In this fast-changing business scenario, the competitiveness of hunting for talents has become more heated than ever. Therefore, removing unconscious bias in your hiring process is a must that every company should be doing. Luckily, with modern technology, there are many useful apps and software that facilitate you to eliminate the hidden biases, optimize your hiring process, and sort out the best potential and suitable talents for your business. Take advantage of them and better your recruitment now!